While it is true that the nominal tenant of the subject apartment is a corporate entity not entitled to a rent-stabilized renewal lease, respondent Moid alleges that the corporate tenancy was a fiction insisted upon by petitioner's predecessor, and that the actual contemplated tenants of the apartment pursuant to the lease providing that "[t]he Apartment shall be occupied only by Tenant and the immediate family of Tenant, for living purposes only" (emphasis added)...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
