KINSMITH FINANCIAL CORP. v. GILROY

Nos. A098147, A098661.

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 478 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 447

KINSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J. Robert GILROY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 16, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Grant, Irvine, Catherine Convy, Los Angeles, Grant, Genovese & Baratta, Irvine, for Appellant/Defendant-J. Robert Gilroy.

Ralph J. Shapira, Ann C. Kim, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, for Respondent/Plaintiff-Kinsmith Financial Corporation.


MARCHIANO, P.J.

Defendant J. Robert Gilroy, a judgment debtor, claims that a 1992 deficiency judgment is unenforceable because more than 10 years passed since issuance of the original foreclosure decree. Gilroy contends that the time for renewing the judgment ran from the date of the foreclosure decree and not from the entry of the deficiency judgment. But the one action rule of Code of Civil Procedure section 726 and the procedure for renewal of judgments in sections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases