In this medical malpractice action, commenced on May 28, 1999, plaintiff complained of injuries sustained as a result of breast augmentation and liposuction procedures. We conclude that the motion court erred in rejecting, as a matter of law, plaintiff's continuous treatment claim and dismissing the complaint as against defendant Cramer on statute of limitations grounds; the issue of whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies here should have been left to the finder...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
