The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. Defendant's intent to kill could be readily inferred from the totality of his conduct, including his act, along with his friends, of surrounding the victim and his act of slashing the victim's abdomen, injuring vital organs (see People v Suero,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
302 A.D.2d 301 (2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 546
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE ANDERSON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 25, 2003.
Decided February 25, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
