Assuming that Emouna is a nonparty witness as plaintiff contends, the motion court properly exercised its discretion in determining that plaintiff failed to show sufficient cause to depose Emouna since plaintiff failed to make the requisite demonstration that the information sought from Emouna was material and necessary (see King v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ILAS v. NIHAGEN & CO., INC.
303 A.D.2d 298 (2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 573
ROBERT ILAS, Appellant, v. NIHAGEN & CO., INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 25, 2003.
Decided March 25, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.