1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 353 S.C.
  5. 353 S.C. 240 (2003)
 

BEAUFORT COUNTY v. STATE

No. 25601.

353 S.C. 240 (2003)

577 S.E.2d 457

BEAUFORT COUNTY, South Carolina, Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina and Richard W. Holtcamp, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided March 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Gibson, Jr., Stephen P. Hughes, and Mary Bass Lohr, all of Howell, Gibson & Hughes, P.A., of Beaufort, for Appellant.

Wendy Bergfeldt Cartledge, of Columbia, for Respondent State of South Carolina.

Robert L. Widener and Erik P. Doerring, both of McNair Law Firm, of Columbia, for Respondent Richard W. Holtcamp.

Justice BURNETT.

Beaufort County appeals the circuit court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the State, finding S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 (Supp.2000) does not violate S.C. Const. art. X. We affirm.

FACTS

Beaufort County asserts S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 violates S.C. Const. art. X. The State contends the statute is constitutional. The Circuit Court granted Richard Holtcamp ("Holtcamp") intervenor status and granted the State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases