Robert CLARK, an individual, and A.D.A. Access Today, a non-profit Pennsylvania Corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
BURGER KING CORPORATION and Dime-Mor II, Inc., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 4, 2003.
April 4, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Brodsky & Smith, LLC, by Evan J. Smith, Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiffs.
W. Barry Blum, Deputy General Counsel, Burger King Corporation, Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA, by Jonathan E. Perlman, Chad K. Lang, Miami, FL, Capehart & Scatchard, PA, by John H. Geaney, Mount Laurel, NJ, for Defendant, Burger King Corporation.
Baron, Riefberg & Ward, A Professional Corporation, by Barbara E. Riefberg, Esq., Voorhees, NJ, for Defendant, Dime-Mor II, Inc.
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before this Court are the motions of Defendant, Burger King Corporation ("BKC"),1 to (1) transfer venue in this dual class action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to the Southern District of Florida, and to (2) dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On February 27, 2003, the Court heard oral argument on the instant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.