GORMAN v. OCHOA


2 A.D.3d 582 (2003)

768 N.Y.S.2d 364

ROSIE GORMAN, Respondent, v. MANUEL OCHOA et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 15, 2003.


Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

It is well settled that the supervision of disclosure is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial court (see Palermo Mason Constr. v Aark Holding Corp., 300 A.D.2d 460, 461 [2002]). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants' motion which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases