1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 2 A.D.3d
  5. 2 A.D.3d 579 (2003)
 

GHAZNAVI v. DITMAS MANAGEMENT CORP.

2 A.D.3d 579 (2003)

768 N.Y.S.2d 366

SUBHAN GHAZNAVI et al., Respondents, v. DITMAS MANAGEMENT CORP. et al., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 15, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants' contention that the jury's answers to the interrogatories on damages were inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review as this issue was not raised before the jury was discharged (see Barry v Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803 [1981]; Delacruz v Galaxy Elecs., 300 A.D.2d 278 [2002]). In any event, the contention is without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases