1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 238 F.Supp.2d
  5. 238 F.Supp.2d 339 (2003)
 

VLT, INC. v. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. CIV.A.00-10238-PBS.

238 F.Supp.2d 339 (2003)

VLT, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Hillman, Fish & Richardson, Boston, MA, Douglas C Doskocil, Paul F. Ware, Daryl L. Wiesen, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, Lawrence K. Kolodney, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, Stephen I. Romine, Fish & Richardson, for VLT Corporation, Vicor Corporation, Plaintiffs.

Robert D. Yeager, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Pittsburgh, PA, for Artesyn Technologies, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

Artesyn Technologies, Inc. ("Artesyn") raises multiple new issues in its multiple claim construction briefs regarding the construction of Claim One of U.S. Patent No. Re. 36,098 ("the '098 patent"). First, it argues that the term "ON period" appearing in Claim One of the '098 patent is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. Second, it urges the Court to construe the terms "prior to," "opened,"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases