With respect to plaintiff's cause of action for negligence, defendants' motion to renew was properly based on an intervening clarification of the law (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]) in 532 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr. (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.