Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence adduced at the hearing warranted the conclusion that the nontestifying officer who initially apprehended defendant did so after hearing a radio transmission containing a very detailed description of defendant as a person who had just sold drugs to an undercover officer (see People v Gonzalez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.