Defendant's claim that voice identification evidence should have been precluded for lack of notice required by CPL 710.30 (1) (b) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that although the notice should have been given (see People v Collins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.