MAVASHEV v. WINDSOR INS. CO.

No. 02CA1244.

72 P.3d 469 (2003)

Barno MAVASHEV and Rubin Mavashev, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WINDSOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frankl & Kabler, P.C., Keith E. Frankl, Steven R. Kabler, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kane, Donley & Johnson, P.C., Mark H. Kane, Colorado Springs, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellee.


Opinion by Judge STERNBERG.*

The determinative issue in this appeal is whether an uninsured motorist (UM) insurance contract that contains a corroboration clause is void as a violation of public policy. The clause provides that, in a hit-and-run accident where the vehicles do not make contact, the policy will provide coverage only if the fact of the accident is corroborated by evidence other than the testimony of a person making a claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases