Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the first and second degrees beyond a reasonable doubt because there was insufficient evidence that he used force to prevent or overcome resistance to the taking of property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking, or that he was aided by another person actually present. The defendant has failed to preserve...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
