Defendants' motion, properly construed by the motion court as one for renewal, was properly denied since the new documents upon which the motion was based, purporting to demonstrate that the mortgage had been satisfied and that defendants had been released from their obligations thereunder, were of dubious provenance and validity, having been executed subsequent to the grant of plaintiff's summary judgment motion and by a party whose authority to act on plaintiff's behalf...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
