Ordered that the order dated February 11, 2003, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order dated October 5, 2001, is reinstated.
The Supreme Court erred in treating the respondent's motion as one for leave to reargue and/or renew. The respondent's motion sought only to vacate and/or modify the order dated October 5, 2001, entered upon her default in appearing (see East Is. Assn. v Carbone,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.