VIDEO PIPELINE v. BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT

No. 02-2497.

342 F.3d 191 (2003)

VIDEO PIPELINE, INC. v. BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc.; Miramax Film Corp., Counterclaim-Plaintiffs v. Video Pipeline, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendant Video Pipeline, Inc., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion filed August 26, 2003.

As Amended September 19, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Fitzmaurice (Argued), Lisa A. Sabatino, Pelino & Lentz, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Gary A. Rosen (Argued), Law Offices of Gary A. Rosen, P.C., Patrick Madamba, Jr., Esquire, Akins, Grump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Jon A. Baumgarten, William M. Hart, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.

Before: BECKER, NYGAARD, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

In this copyright case we review the District Court's entry of a preliminary injunction against Video Pipeline, Inc.'s on-line display of "clip previews." A "clip preview," as we use the term, is an approximately two-minute segment of a movie, copied without authorization from the film's copyright holder, and used in the same way as an authorized movie "trailer." We reserve the term "trailer" for previews created...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases