The motion was premature. Appellant admits that less than two years before the accident, it retiled the bathroom floor directly above the kitchen in which plaintiff was injured, but its witness lacked personal knowledge of the work and could not say for certain whether the floor had been removed down to the floor joist. Even if the witness's testimony as to appellant's routine practices sufficed to make a prima facie showing that appellant's work involved removal of the floor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
