In any event, were we to find that defendant's claims are not foreclosed by his appeal waiver, we would find no basis for reducing the sentence. Even assuming, without deciding, that defendant had a right to counsel at his postplea contacts with the authorities, the record establishes that there was no violation of that right (see People v Beam,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FLIKSHTEYN
305 A.D.2d 225 (2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 490
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER FLIKSHTEYN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 15, 2003.
Decided May 15, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
