1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 79 Conn.
  5. 79 Conn. App. 444 (2003)
 

SORBAN v. STERLING ENGINEERING CORP.

(AC 23146).

79 Conn. App. 444 (2003)

EMIL SORBAN v. STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released September 16, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric H. Rothauser, with whom were Thomas Cunnane, legal intern, and, on the brief, John L. Bonee III, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Anne Kelly Zovas, with whom, on the brief, was Courtney C. Stabnick, for the appellee (defendant).

Lavery, C.J., and Foti and McLachlan, Js.

Opinion

LAVERY, C.J.

The plaintiff employee, Emil Sorban, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant employer, Sterling Engineering Corporation. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the substantial certainty exception to the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., is equivalent to inevitability and (2) there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases