HANCOCK v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. 3645.

355 S.C. 168 (2003)

584 S.E.2d 398

Richard HANCOCK, Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided June 2, 2003.

Rehearing Denied August 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Lee, Matthew N. Tyler, Amy Anderson Wise, of Florence, for Appellant.

Ronald B. Diegel, of Columbia, for Respondent.


MOREHEAD, Acting Judge:

Richard Hancock was injured while working for his employer on Wal-Mart's premises. Hancock filed suit in the circuit court, alleging his injuries were the result of Wal-Mart's negligence. The trial judge granted Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment, finding workers' compensation was Hancock's exclusive remedy. Hancock appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

Tru-Wheels, Inc., one of Wal-Mart's vendors, employed Hancock. Tru-Wheels provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases