1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 277 F.Supp.2d
  5. 277 F.Supp.2d 245 (2003)
 

STEADFAST INS. CO. v. STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

No. 02 Civ. 8786(SAS).

277 F.Supp.2d 245 (2003)

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 27, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph G. Finnerty III, Robin C. Tarr, Piper Rudnick LLP, New York, New York, for Plaintiff.

Melvin A. Brosterman, Jonathan A. Siegel, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant, pro se.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Steadfast Insurance Company ("Steadfast") seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify its insured, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP ("Stroock"), for its losses in connection with a now settled California bankruptcy adversary proceeding ("Bankruptcy Proceeding").

Steadfast moves for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases