The motion was properly denied on the ground that a complaint verified by counsel who does not claim personal knowledge of the facts is insufficient to support a default judgment (see Francisco v Soto,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SAKS v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
302 A.D.2d 213 (2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 377
SHLOMO SAKS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 4, 2003.
Decided February 4, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.