1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 302 A.D.2d
  5. 302 A.D.2d 209 (2003)
 

COHEN v. ARK ASSET HOLDINGS, INC.

302 A.D.2d 209 (2003)

755 N.Y.S.2d 37

SAUL S. COHEN, Appellant, v. ARK ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 4, 2003.

Contrary to appellant former shareholder's contention, Supreme Court fulfilled its role in determining, correctly, that the arbitrator's award was not irrational, contrary to public policy, or in manifest disregard of the law (see Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 86 N.Y.2d 146, 155 [1995]). Her determination that redemption was authorized was rational because, inter alia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases