1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 340 F.3d
  5. 340 F.3d 169 (2003)
 

U.S. v. LOPEZ

No. 02-1111.

340 F.3d 169 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Albert LOPEZ, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed August 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel I. Siegel (Argued), Office of the Federal Public Defender, 100 Chestnut Street, Suite 306, Harrisburg, PA 17101, Counsel for Appellant.

Matthew E. Haggerty, Esq. Christian A. Fisanick, Esq. (Argued), Office of United States Attorney, Federal Building, P.O. Box 309, Scranton, PA 18501. Theodore B. Smith, III, Esq. Office of United States Attorney, 228 Walnut Street, P.O. Box 11754, Harrisburg, PA 17108, Counsel for Appellee.

Before BARRY and ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

POLLAK, District Judge.

Albert Lopez, a federal prisoner, was convicted of (1) possession of heroin, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(a), and (2) possession of contraband by an inmate, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(1). On appeal, Lopez challenges two evidentiary rulings of the District Court, as well as the District Court's ruling that the government's voir dire peremptory challenge of a black jury panelist was not keyed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases