1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 133 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 376 (2003)
 

COSSMAN v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

No. A097110.

133 Cal.Rptr.2d 376 (2003)

108 Cal.App.4th 370

Max COSSMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

As Modified April 30, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry F. Wartnick, San Francisco, Richard A. Brody, Novato, The Wartnick Law Firm, Frank S. Moore, Law Offices of Frank S. Moore, for Plaintiff and Appellant Max Cossman.

Justs N. Karlsons, David M. Rice, Rosemary Springer, San Francisco, Carroll, Burdick, & McDonough, LLP, for Defendants and Respondents DaimlerChrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, and Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Gary T. Drummond, Esq., Walnut Creek, Stevens, Drummond & Gifford, for Respondent Pneumo Abex Corp., Inc.

MARCHIANO, P.J.

Plaintiffs Max and Bette Cossman brought an action alleging that Bette Cossman was exposed to asbestos that resulted in a diagnosis of mesothelioma in 1994. Max Cossman appeals from the superior court's granting of a nonsuit in favor of several Indiana defendants based on the Indiana statute of limitations.1

The issue we consider is whether a nonresident plaintiff may bring a tort action in California that accrued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases