IN RE KUMLEY

(OSB 01-32; SC S49372).

75 P.3d 432 (2003)

335 Or. 639

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT of Lloyd S. KUMLEY, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 14, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin T. Lafky, of Lafky & Lafky, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused.

Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar. With her on the brief was Russell Lipetzky, Bar Counsel, Salem.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, De MUNIZ, and BALMER, Justices.


PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused, an inactive member of the Bar, violated two Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules—DR 1-102(A)(2) and DR 1-102(A)(3)-and one statute—ORS 9.160—by describing himself as an "attorney" in forms that he submitted to two state agencies in connection with his candidacy for a seat in the state legislature. A trial panel of the Disciplinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases