1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 67 P.3d
  5. 67 P.3d 433 (2003)
 

BASMACI v. STANLEY WORKS

98-10143; A118494

67 P.3d 433 (2003)

187 Or. App. 337

In the Matter of the Compensation of Metin Basmaci, Claimant. Metin BASMACI, Petitioner, v. The STANLEY WORKS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 24, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Hill, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Hill & Wren, LLP.

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

LANDAU, P.J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board on remand from our opinion in Basmaci v. The Stanley Works, 177 Or.App. 102, 33 P.3d 377 (2001), contending that the board erred in holding that he has not perfected a new medical condition claim. We affirm.

Claimant experienced back pain while being treated with orthotics for a compensable foot problem...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases