1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 2 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 2 Cal.Rptr.3d 497 (2003)
 

HOGAR DULCE HOGAR v. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

No. D039163.

2 Cal.Rptr.3d 497 (2003)

110 Cal.App.4th 1288

HOGAR DULCE HOGAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF the CITY OF ESCONDIDO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Rehearing Denied August 25, 2003.

Review Denied October 29, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

San Diego Advocates for Social Justice, Catherine A. Rodman, Post, Kirby, Noonan and Sweat and R. Bruce Wayne, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jeffrey R. Epp, City Attorney, Jennifer K. McCain, Assistant City Attorney; Hogan, Guiney, Dick and Michael M. Hogan for Defendants and Appellants.

Certified for Partial Publication.1

BENKE, J.

Under the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf.Code,2 § 33000 et seq.) (CRL), local redevelopment agencies receive so-called tax increment funds generated by redevelopment projects they have initiated. The CRL requires that 20 percent of such tax increment funds be placed in a Low and Moderate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases