1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 119 S.W.3d
  5. 119 S.W.3d 378 (2003)
 

TATE v. BEAL

No. 2-02-350-CV.

119 S.W.3d 378 (2003)

Danielle TATE, Appellant, v. Joel BEAL, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled October 2, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinesmith & Lynch, L.L.P., Karl F. Lynch, Denton, for Appellant.

Miller & McCarthy, P.C., Michael A. Miller, Joel B. Hudson, Dallas, for Appellee.

Panel F: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

OPINION

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Danielle Tate appeals from a summary judgment for Joel Beal based on the statute of limitations. In a single issue, Tate complains that the summary judgment is improper because the evidence does not show as a matter of law that she failed to exercise due diligence in serving Beal with process. We will reverse and remand.

Tate seeks personal injury damages from Beal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases