U.S. v. GILL

No. 01-6538.

348 F.3d 147 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher GILL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: October 31, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: April R. Goode, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.

Victor L. Ivy, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: M. Dianne Smothers, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.

Victor L. Ivy, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Before: MOORE and CLAY, Circuit Judges; LAWSON, District Judge.


Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

The United States Sentencing Commission has prescribed a methodology that trial courts must use to determine a sentencing range in a criminal case. A key ingredient of the sentencing formula in drug cases is the quantity of a controlled substance for which a convicted defendant will be held accountable. A defendant is responsible for all drug quantities that are included...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases