The court properly exercised its discretion in denying appellants' motion to strike plaintiffs' note of issue and in determining that appellants had waived their right to a physical examination of plaintiffs by failing to comply with the deadlines set in the court's prior order (see Mateo v City of New York,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.