FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER v. SONOMA WATER AGENCY

No. A098118.

134 Cal.Rptr.2d 322 (2003)

108 Cal.App.4th 859

FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY, Defendant and Respondent; Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 13, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Stephan C. Volker, San Francisco, and Eileen M. Rice, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Steven M. Woodside, County Counsel, Jill D. Golis, Deputy County Counsel, Sheryl L. Bratton, Deputy County Counsel; Bartkiewicz, Kronick & Shanahan, Alan B. Lilly, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Pacific Gas and Electric Company.


MARGULIES, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal, we determine the sufficiency of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by defendant and respondent Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency) for a project increasing the Agency's withdrawal of water from the Russian River. Appellants, Friends of the Eel River et al.,1 contend the EIR does not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases