PEOPLE v. KING


306 A.D.2d 143 (2003)

760 N.Y.S.2d 315

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALMARIE KING, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 17, 2003.


The challenged portions of the People's summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884 [1993]). Contrary to defendant's arguments, the prosecutor did not attempt to provide his own expert opinion or misstate the facts. Instead, he drew reasonable inferences from the evidence that were addressed to the jurors' common sense. The prosecutor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases