Plaintiff's breach of contract claim alleging defendant's unjustified reduction of the arbitrage vehicle's profitability, and resulting elimination of a large part of plaintiff's expected profit from the transaction, was properly dismissed in view of the provisions in the parties' agreements that defendant's arbitrage profit calculations "shall be binding and final absent manifest error" (see Matter of Hermance v Board of Supervisors, 71 N.Y. 481, 486 [1877]) and that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
