YOUNG v. RUTKIN

(AC 23239).

79 Conn. App. 355 (2003)

RICHARD YOUNG v. ARNOLD RUTKIN

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released September 9, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Williams, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Paul E. Pollock, for the appellee (defendant).

Schaller, Flynn and West, Js.


Opinion

WEST, J.

The plaintiff, Richard Young, appeals from the judgment of the trial court directing a verdict for the defendant, Arnold Rutkin, an attorney, in this legal malpractice action. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) held that his expert witnesses were not qualified to offer opinion evidence and (2) directed the verdict when the evidence was sufficient for submission to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases