Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant's contention that the risk level assessment and case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board) pursuant to Correction Law § 168-l demonstrated that he should have been designated as a level one, rather than a level two, sex offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Baker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.