Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review, as he did not raise this argument in the trial court in support of his motion to dismiss (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.