1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 278 F.Supp.2d
  5. 278 F.Supp.2d 101 (2003)
 

MINNESOTA v. PHARMACIA CORP.

No. CIV.A. 03-10069-PBS.

278 F.Supp.2d 101 (2003)

State of MINNESOTA, Plaintiff, v. PHARMACIA CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 20, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Vanselow, Minnesota Attorney Generals Office, St. Paul, MN, for Plaintiff.

John C. Dodds, Morgan Lewis & Boskius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, James Lloyd Volling, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

DISCUSSION

Defendant Pharmacia Corporation moves for reconsideration of the Court's June 11, 2003 Order remanding this suit back to state court in Minnesota. Pharmacia's principal argument is that the Court misinterpreted the Supreme Court's decision in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 106 S.Ct. 3229, 92 L.Ed.2d 650 (1986), by holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases