1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 323 F.3d
  5. 323 F.3d 55 (2003)
 

BOGOSIAN v. WOLOOHOJIAN REALTY CORP.

Nos. 01-1542, 02-1196, 02-1235.

323 F.3d 55 (2003)

Elizabeth V. BOGOSIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. WOLOOHOJIAN REALTY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, James E. Woloohojian, Harry J. Woloohojian, Pezzuco Construction Co., Inc., Cummings & Lockwood, and Tillinghast, Licht & Semonoff, et al., Appellees. Elizabeth V. Bogosian, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Woloohojian Realty Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, James E. Woloohojian, Harry J. Woloohojian, Pezzuco Construction Co., Inc., Cummings & Lockwood, and Tillinghast, Licht & Semonoff, et al., Appellees. Elizabeth V. Bogosian, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Woloohojian Realty Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, James E. Woloohojian, Harry J. Woloohojian, Pezzuco Construction Co., Inc., Cummings & Lockwood, and Tillinghast, Licht & Semonoff, et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided March 19, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Condit, for appellant/cross-appellee Elizabeth Bogosian.

William R. Grimm, with whom Brian C. Newberry and Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP were on brief for appellee James H. Woloohojian and cross-appellant Woloohojian Realty Corp.

William P. Devereaux, with whom Stephen A. Izzi and Holland & Knight, LLP, were on brief for appellee Harry Woloohojian, a/k/a Estate of Harry J. Woloohojian.

Charles D. Ray, with whom Robert P. Dolian and Cummings & Lockwood, LLC were on brief for appellee Cummings & Lockwood.

Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, and CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.

CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Elizabeth V. Bogosian appeals from a district court judgment which (i) rejected the contention that her two brothers conspired to "freeze" her out of the family business, and (ii) determined that she was entitled to recover not more than $4,000,000, plus prejudgment interest, for her minority interest in the business. The defendants in turn cross-appeal from a district court ruling that their interest award should be calculated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases