1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 2 A.D.3d
  5. 2 A.D.3d 371 (2003)
 

KONECKY v. KRONFELD

2 A.D.3d 371 (2003)

768 N.Y.S.2d 820

ELIZABETH KONECKY, Respondent, v. YAAKOV KRONFELD, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 30, 2003.

The predominant consideration of the court in determining an award of temporary spousal maintenance is the financial need of the party making the application, with the parties' income and assets to be taken into account (Ritter v Ritter, 135 A.D.2d 421, 422 [1987]). As is often the case, the temporary award is based on conflicting affidavits, offering differing versions of the parties' finances and the standard of living they enjoyed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases