1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 243 F.Supp.2d
  5. 243 F.Supp.2d 117 (2003)
 

WRIGHT v. PEPSI COLA CO.

No. CIV.A.02-563-JJF.

243 F.Supp.2d 117 (2003)

Brent WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. PEPSI COLA COMPANY, Lou Papille, Sean Jackson, Rich Chaminski, Tom Rylie, Allison McKinnon and Bob Coggins, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 29, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darryl K. Fountain, Esquire of Darryl K. Fountain, Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware. Attorney for Plaintiff.

Sean P. McDevitt, Esquire of Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington, Delaware. Attorney for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I.2) and Plantiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint (D.I.7). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I.2) will be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs Motion to Amend (D.I.7) will be denied as moot.

BACKGROUND

1. Facts

Plaintiff, Brent Wright, is a black male who has been employed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases