STATE v. CARLSON

No. 01-1136-CR.

261 Wis.2d 97 (2003)

2003 WI 40

661 N.W.2d 51

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael W. CARLSON, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 13, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Steven L. Miller and Miller & Miller, River Falls, and oral argument by Steven L. Miller.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Eileen W. Pray, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.


¶ 1. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

We reverse the court of appeals' decision, which affirmed an order by the Brown County Circuit Court, which denied a motion for a new trial. The motion claimed that one of the jurors could not understand English sufficiently to serve as a juror.

¶ 2. We hold that an ability to understand the English language is necessary in order to satisfy the requirements Wis. Stat. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases