1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 80 P.3d
  5. 80 P.3d 269 (2003)
 

BILKE v. STATE

No. CV-03-0034-PR.

80 P.3d 269 (2003)

206 Ariz. 462

Mitchell Paul BILKE; Charles Robert; Kenneth Ashelman; Felton Hale; Richard S. Berry; Mervin L. Davis and Damon D. Fisher, individually and as members of a class, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of Arizona; Arcor Enterprises, a subdivision of the State; Arizona Correctional Industries, a subdivision of the State, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

December 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General by Daniel P. Schaack, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Defendants-Appellants.

Michael E. St. George, Tempe, Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 In Arizona, "an interlocutory judgment which determines the rights of the parties and directs an accounting or other proceeding to determine the amount of the recovery" may be appealed. Ariz.Rev.Stat. ("A.R.S.") § 12-2101(G) (2003). We granted review to resolve a conflict between two decisions of the court of appeals as to the proper interpretation of the phrase "accounting or other proceeding to determine the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases