1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 309 A.D.2d
  5. 309 A.D.2d 34 (2003)
 

SARJOO v. HEALTH & HOSPS CORP

309 A.D.2d 34 (2003)

763 N.Y.S.2d 306

RICARDO SARJOO et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Gaier of counsel (Norman Bard on the brief; Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, attorneys), for respondents.

Fay Ng of counsel (Pamela Seider Dolgow on the brief; Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City, attorney), for appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., and WILLIAMS, J., concur with TOM, J.; LERNER, J., dissents in a separate opinion.

OPINION OF THE COURT

TOM, J.

In this appeal, we examine whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies so as to make timely the filing of a notice of claim under General Municipal Law § 50-e during the tolling period for infancy for the statute of limitations, when the section 50-e limitations period had lapsed, and leave to file a late notice of claim was never requested.

The infant plaintiff's parents are citizens of Guyana. His mother...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases