1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 61 P.3d
  5. 61 P.3d 276 (2003)
 

ALASKA TANKER CO. v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

01-AB-1057; A115164.

61 P.3d 276 (2003)

185 Or. App. 687

ALASKA TANKER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Sean D. Walker, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 8, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Garone, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.

No appearance for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

SCHUMAN, J.

The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) held that claimant was entitled to full benefits for a period of unemployment, rejecting employer's argument that benefits should be reduced by the amount of vacation pay that employer contributed to claimant's union on claimant's behalf. We review the EAB's factual findings for substantial evidence and its legal conclusions for errors of law. ORS 183.482(8); Hoffman Construction Co. v. Employment Dept.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases