1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 2 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 2 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2003)
 

VITTON CONST. CO. v. PACIFIC INS. CO.

No. A096749.

2 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2003)

110 Cal.App.4th 762

VITTON CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC INSURANCE CO., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

As Modified July 18, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Wagoner, Todd W. Baxter, Geni K. Krogstad, McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Fresno, for Appellants Vitton Construction Company and AIU Insurance Company.

Donald W. Rees, Steven C. Bitter, Patricia S. Goodman, David C. Hungerford, Gordon & Rees, San Francisco, for Respondent Pacific Insurance Company.

PARRILLI, J.

Having concluded a general contractor was not entitled to coverage as an additional insured under a policy held by one of its subcontractors, the trial court granted summary judgment in this subrogation action in favor of the subcontractor's insurer, Pacific Insurance Company (Pacific). In so doing, the court distinguished our decision in Acceptance Ins. Co. v. Syufy Enterprises (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 321

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases