BEALL TRANSPORT EQUIP. CO. v. SO. PACIFIC

9701-00347, 9701-00757, A102619.

68 P.3d 259 (2003)

187 Or. App. 472

BEALL TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT CO., an Oregon corporation, Respondent, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION, a Delaware corporation; Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah corporation; City of Portland; State of Oregon, acting by and through the Department of Motor Vehicles; John Hren; John R. Greisen; Thomas Morrison; W. Raymond Horn; Stuart Abrams; Wayne C. Klepper and Stuart Abrams, dba Abrams Metals, Inc., Defendants, and Abrams, Inc., dba Abrams Scrap Metals, Inc., Appellant. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah corporation, Third-Party Respondents, v. Wayne C. Klepper, Third-Party Defendant, and Stuart Abrams, Third-Party Appellant. Abrams, Inc., Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah corporation, Respondents, and Wayne Klepper and Pat Ryan, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Petition for Reconsideration April 2, 2003.

Decided May 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher T. Carson, Gregory B. Snook, Portland, Jeffrey A. Kilmer, and Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick, P.C., for petition.

Thomas M. Christ and Michael H. Bloom, Portland, contra.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


On Respondents Southern Pacific Transportation Company's and Union Pacific Railroad Company's Petition for Reconsideration March 26, 2003.

Appellant Abrams, Inc.'s, and Third-Party Appellant Stuart Abrams's Response to Petition for Reconsideration April 2, 2003.

HASELTON, P.J.

Respondents Southern Pacific Transportation and Union Pacific Railroad Company (collectively "Southern Pacific")1 petition for clarification of our...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases