INTEX RECREATION CORP. v. METALAST, S.A. SOCIEDAD UNIPERSONAL

No. CIV.A. 01-1213(JDB).

245 F.Supp.2d 65 (2003)

INTEX RECREATION CORP., Plaintiff, v. METALAST, S.A. SOCIEDAD UNIPERSONAL, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 12, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Charles Casano, Greenstein, Delorme & Luchs, P.C., Washington, David N. Makous, Thomas S. Kidde, Daniel C. Decarlo, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant.

John E. Curtin, Fairfax, VA, Martin G. Raskin, Joshua L. Raskin, Steinberg & Raskin, PC, New York, NY, Counsel for Defendant/Counter-claimant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

BATES, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the issue of claim construction relating to a patent on a swimming pool ladder. Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp. ("Intex") and defendant Metalast, S.A., Sociedad Unipersonal ("Metalast") take opposing vi the meaning of a key term employed in the claim language of the patent, and thus on the scope of the patent. A hearing on claim construction was held on October 11, 2002...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases